WEDNESDAY SUPERVISED (26-JUN-24)

Pair 6 EW - DENISE SAMPSON / MICHELLE OTT
Place: 1, Percentage: 70.09%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	6: CATHERINE WILSON / KATHERINE KIRBY	4 W	JS	9	-50	4	40%
Board 2	6: CATHERINE WILSON / KATHERINE KIRBY	2 E	5C	9	110	10	100%
Board 3	6: CATHERINE WILSON / KATHERINE KIRBY	3NT E	4H	10	630	7	88%
Board 4	6: CATHERINE WILSON / KATHERINE KIRBY	5 N	9C	9	200	8	100%
Board 5	1: THERESIA ZILKER / JANICE BODEKER	3NT W	4H	10	430	9	90%
Board 6	1: THERESIA ZILKER / JANICE BODEKER	2 S	JD	11	-200	9	90%
Board 7	1: THERESIA ZILKER / JANICE BODEKER	3NT S	QH	7	200	7	88%
Board 8	1: THERESIA ZILKER / JANICE BODEKER	3NT E	KS	9	400	8	100%
Board 9	4: Helen Hatfield / Helen Robins	4 S	7S	9	50	9	90%
Board 10	4: Helen Hatfield / Helen Robins	4 E	4H	10	620	8	80%
Board 11	4: Helen Hatfield / Helen Robins	3 N	AD	8	50	8	80%
Board 12	4: Helen Hatfield / Helen Robins	3 S	AC	8	100	10	100%
Board 13	2: LYNDA LITCHFIELD / ULLA STENQVIST	4 N	TH	12	-680	2	20%
Board 14	2: LYNDA LITCHFIELD / ULLA STENQVIST	5 E	2H	11	400	8	80%
Board 15	2: LYNDA LITCHFIELD / ULLA STENQVIST	3NT S	7H	6	300	8	100%
Board 16	2: LYNDA LITCHFIELD / ULLA STENQVIST	2 N	3C	6	100	7	88%
Board 17	5: GUY MOODY / John Moody	4 W	AD	10	420	8	80%
Board 18	5: GUY MOODY / John Moody	4 N	5D	4	600	10	100%
Board 21	3: FRED HOETMER / SANDRA MINGAY	1NT W	2C	7	90	3	30%
Board 22	3: FRED HOETMER / SANDRA MINGAY	1X S	TH	10	-460	0	0%
Board 23	3: FRED HOETMER / SANDRA MINGAY	2NT E	QD	6	-200	0	0%
Board 24	3: FRED HOETMER / SANDRA MINGAY	3 W	7C	7	-100	0	0%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.