Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 Burman Team	3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	2 S	3D	8	110			5	-5
2 Hunter Team	5 Davis Team	2 S	JS	7		50		-4	4
3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	1 Burman Team	2 E	AH	8		90		-5	5
4 Hardman Team	13 Cowcill Team	1NT W	7H	7		90		-1	1
5 Davis Team	2 Hunter Team	2 S	3D	8	110			4	-4
6 Hardie Team	8 Ford Team	2 S	3D	7		50		2	-2
7 Mulholland Team	11 Hardman Team	3 S	6S	9	140			1	-1
8 Ford Team	6 Hardie Team	3 S	6S	7		100		-2	2
9 Webb Team	14 Waters Team	2 S	3D	8	110			0	0
10 Blakely Team	16 Kemmer Team	3 W	7H	6	300			8	-8
11 Hardman Team	7 Mulholland Team	2 W	7H	7	100			-1	1
12 Sampson Team	15 Turner Team	2 N	3D	7		50		-6	6
13 Cowcill Team	4 Hardman Team	2 S	3D	7		50		1	-1
14 Waters Team	9 Webb Team	2 S	3D	8	110			0	0
15 Turner Team	12 Sampson Team	2NT W	7H	6	200			6	-6
16 Kemmer Team	10 Blakely Team	3 S	3D	8		50		-8	8

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

BOARD 16
BD: 16	QJT8	Dlr: W
	Q5	Vul: E-W
	AJT9
	754
K972		A63
KJT6		A8
63		KQ52
A83		QT62
	54
	97432
	874
	KJ9
NT N - - - - -     10   S - - - - -   11   15 E 4 3 3 3 3     4   W 4 3 3 3 3

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 16
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by EW	-3	300	1
2NT by EW	-2	200	1
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by NS	=	110	4
2 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by NS	-1	-50	3
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by EW	=	-90	1
1NT by EW	=	-90	1
3 by NS	-2	-100	1

Alternative display format