Boards Results

TEAMS OF 3 - MATCH 5

Board No: 22
Dealer: E, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -90

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Burman Team 5 Davis Team 2NT W KS 8 120 -9 9

2 Hunter Team 4 Hardman Team 1NT W JS 7 90 0 0

3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team 12 Sampson Team 2 N KD 6 100 2 -2

4 Hardman Team 2 Hunter Team 1 E JH 7 80 0 0

5 Davis Team 1 Burman Team 3NT E 3C 6 300 9 -9

6 Hardie Team 16 Kemmer Team 2NT E KH 7 100 6 -6

7 Mulholland Team 8 Ford Team 2X N AC 5 500 -8 8

8 Ford Team 7 Mulholland Team 3 N AD 6 150 8 -8

9 Webb Team 11 Hardman Team 3 W TC 8 100 6 -6

10 Blakely Team 14 Waters Team 3NT E KH 8 100 6 -6

11 Hardman Team 9 Webb Team 1NT W KS 8 120 -6 6

12 Sampson Team 3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team 2NT W 7D 9 150 -2 2

13 Cowcill Team 15 Turner Team 2NT E 2C 9 150 -1 1

14 Waters Team 10 Blakely Team 2NT E 3C 9 150 -6 6

15 Turner Team 13 Cowcill Team 1NT W TC 8 120 1 -1

16 Kemmer Team 6 Hardie Team 3 W TC 9 140 -6 6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

BOARD 22

BD: 22 KJ6 Dlr: E

KT87 Vul: E-W

T8765

8

T42 AQ53

J4 AQ932

QJ93 4

KQ93 T72

987

65

AK2

AJ654

NT

N - 1 - - - 7

S - 1 - - - 9 12

E 2 - 1 2 2 12

W 2 - 1 2 2

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 22
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by EW -3 300 1
2NT by EW -1 100 1
3 by EW -1 100 1
3NT by EW -1 100 1
1 by EW = -80 1
1NT by EW = -90 1
2 by NS -2 -100 1
2NT by EW = -120 1
1NT by EW +1 -120 2
3 by EW = -140 1
3 by NS -3 -150 1
2NT by EW +1 -150 1
2NT by EW +1 -150 2
2X by NS -3 -500 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Burman Team	5 Davis Team	2NT W	KS	8		120	-9	9
2 Hunter Team	4 Hardman Team	1NT W	JS	7		90	0	0
3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	12 Sampson Team	2 N	KD	6		100	2	-2
4 Hardman Team	2 Hunter Team	1 E	JH	7		80	0	0
5 Davis Team	1 Burman Team	3NT E	3C	6	300		9	-9
6 Hardie Team	16 Kemmer Team	2NT E	KH	7	100		6	-6
7 Mulholland Team	8 Ford Team	2X N	AC	5		500	-8	8
8 Ford Team	7 Mulholland Team	3 N	AD	6		150	8	-8
9 Webb Team	11 Hardman Team	3 W	TC	8	100		6	-6
10 Blakely Team	14 Waters Team	3NT E	KH	8	100		6	-6
11 Hardman Team	9 Webb Team	1NT W	KS	8		120	-6	6
12 Sampson Team	3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	2NT W	7D	9		150	-2	2
13 Cowcill Team	15 Turner Team	2NT E	2C	9		150	-1	1
14 Waters Team	10 Blakely Team	2NT E	3C	9		150	-6	6
15 Turner Team	13 Cowcill Team	1NT W	TC	8		120	1	-1
16 Kemmer Team	6 Hardie Team	3 W	TC	9		140	-6	6

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 22
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by EW	-3	300	1
2NT by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	-1	100	1
3NT by EW	-1	100	1
1 by EW	=	-80	1
1NT by EW	=	-90	1
2 by NS	-2	-100	1
2NT by EW	=	-120	1
1NT by EW	+1	-120	2
3 by EW	=	-140	1
3 by NS	-3	-150	1
2NT by EW	+1	-150	1
2NT by EW	+1	-150	2
2X by NS	-3	-500	1