Boards Results

TEAMS OF 3 - MATCH 6

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -170

Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

13 Cowcill Team 1 Burman Team 3 E 6S 11 150 10 -10

4 Hardman Team 10 Blakely Team 4 E 2S 9 100 6 -6

6 Hardie Team 15 Turner Team 3 E 2S 11 200 3 -3

16 Kemmer Team 7 Mulholland Team 2 W 6S 11 150 2 -2

8 Ford Team 2 Hunter Team 3 W 6S 11 150 1 -1

9 Webb Team 12 Sampson Team 3 W 9H 10 130 1 -1

11 Hardman Team 14 Waters Team 3 W 9H 10 130 1 -1

3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team 5 Davis Team 2 W 7H 13 190 0 0

5 Davis Team 3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team 2 E 8C 13 190 0 0

2 Hunter Team 8 Ford Team 2 W QD 12 170 -1 1

12 Sampson Team 9 Webb Team 3 W 6S 11 150 -1 1

14 Waters Team 11 Hardman Team 3 W 6S 11 150 -1 1

7 Mulholland Team 16 Kemmer Team 2 E 4S 12 230 -2 2

15 Turner Team 6 Hardie Team 3 S AC 6 300 -3 3

10 Blakely Team 4 Hardman Team 2NT W 6S 9 150 -6 6

1 Burman Team 13 Cowcill Team 4 E 4S 10 620 -10 10

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Next Board     Jump to

BOARD 26

BD: 26 94 Dlr: E

JT76 Vul: Both

T984

A54

QT7653 AKJ8

985 AQ43

3 K2

962 KT3

2

K2

AQJ765

QJ87

NT

N 2 4 - - - 5

S 2 4 - - - 2 20

E - - 1 3 - 13

W - - 1 3 -

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -1 100 1
3 by EW +1 -130 2
2NT by EW +1 -150 1
3 by EW +2 -150 3
3 by EW +2 -150 1
2 by EW +3 -150 1
2 by EW +4 -170 1
2 by EW +5 -190 1
2 by EW +5 -190 1
3 by EW +2 -200 1
2 by EW +4 -230 1
3 by NS -3 -300 1
4 by EW = -620 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
13 Cowcill Team	1 Burman Team	3 E	6S	11		150	10	-10
4 Hardman Team	10 Blakely Team	4 E	2S	9	100		6	-6
6 Hardie Team	15 Turner Team	3 E	2S	11		200	3	-3
16 Kemmer Team	7 Mulholland Team	2 W	6S	11		150	2	-2
8 Ford Team	2 Hunter Team	3 W	6S	11		150	1	-1
9 Webb Team	12 Sampson Team	3 W	9H	10		130	1	-1
11 Hardman Team	14 Waters Team	3 W	9H	10		130	1	-1
3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	5 Davis Team	2 W	7H	13		190	0	0
5 Davis Team	3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	2 E	8C	13		190	0	0
2 Hunter Team	8 Ford Team	2 W	QD	12		170	-1	1
12 Sampson Team	9 Webb Team	3 W	6S	11		150	-1	1
14 Waters Team	11 Hardman Team	3 W	6S	11		150	-1	1
7 Mulholland Team	16 Kemmer Team	2 E	4S	12		230	-2	2
15 Turner Team	6 Hardie Team	3 S	AC	6		300	-3	3
10 Blakely Team	4 Hardman Team	2NT W	6S	9		150	-6	6
1 Burman Team	13 Cowcill Team	4 E	4S	10		620	-10	10

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	2
2NT by EW	+1	-150	1
3 by EW	+2	-150	3
3 by EW	+2	-150	1
2 by EW	+3	-150	1
2 by EW	+4	-170	1
2 by EW	+5	-190	1
2 by EW	+5	-190	1
3 by EW	+2	-200	1
2 by EW	+4	-230	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
4 by EW	=	-620	1