Boards Results

TEAMS OF 3 - MATCH 6

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -170

Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

13 Cowcill Team 1 Burman Team 3 E 6S 11 150 10 -10

8 Ford Team 2 Hunter Team 3 W 6S 11 150 1 -1

5 Davis Team 3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team 2 E 8C 13 190 0 0

10 Blakely Team 4 Hardman Team 2NT W 6S 9 150 -6 6

3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team 5 Davis Team 2 W 7H 13 190 0 0

15 Turner Team 6 Hardie Team 3 S AC 6 300 -3 3

16 Kemmer Team 7 Mulholland Team 2 W 6S 11 150 2 -2

2 Hunter Team 8 Ford Team 2 W QD 12 170 -1 1

12 Sampson Team 9 Webb Team 3 W 6S 11 150 -1 1

4 Hardman Team 10 Blakely Team 4 E 2S 9 100 6 -6

14 Waters Team 11 Hardman Team 3 W 6S 11 150 -1 1

9 Webb Team 12 Sampson Team 3 W 9H 10 130 1 -1

1 Burman Team 13 Cowcill Team 4 E 4S 10 620 -10 10

11 Hardman Team 14 Waters Team 3 W 9H 10 130 1 -1

6 Hardie Team 15 Turner Team 3 E 2S 11 200 3 -3

7 Mulholland Team 16 Kemmer Team 2 E 4S 12 230 -2 2

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Next Board     Jump to

BOARD 26

BD: 26 A82 Dlr: E

A762 Vul: Both

A6

AK73

T63 974

QJ98 KT3

3 Q752

Q8652 JT9

KQJ5

54

KJT984

4

NT

N 1 6 3 6 4 19

S 1 6 3 6 4 5 6

E - - - - - 10

W - - - - -

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -1 100 1
3 by EW +1 -130 2
2NT by EW +1 -150 1
3 by EW +2 -150 3
3 by EW +2 -150 1
2 by EW +3 -150 1
2 by EW +4 -170 1
2 by EW +5 -190 1
2 by EW +5 -190 1
3 by EW +2 -200 1
2 by EW +4 -230 1
3 by NS -3 -300 1
4 by EW = -620 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
13 Cowcill Team	1 Burman Team	3 E	6S	11		150	10	-10
8 Ford Team	2 Hunter Team	3 W	6S	11		150	1	-1
5 Davis Team	3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	2 E	8C	13		190	0	0
10 Blakely Team	4 Hardman Team	2NT W	6S	9		150	-6	6
3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	5 Davis Team	2 W	7H	13		190	0	0
15 Turner Team	6 Hardie Team	3 S	AC	6		300	-3	3
16 Kemmer Team	7 Mulholland Team	2 W	6S	11		150	2	-2
2 Hunter Team	8 Ford Team	2 W	QD	12		170	-1	1
12 Sampson Team	9 Webb Team	3 W	6S	11		150	-1	1
4 Hardman Team	10 Blakely Team	4 E	2S	9	100		6	-6
14 Waters Team	11 Hardman Team	3 W	6S	11		150	-1	1
9 Webb Team	12 Sampson Team	3 W	9H	10		130	1	-1
1 Burman Team	13 Cowcill Team	4 E	4S	10		620	-10	10
11 Hardman Team	14 Waters Team	3 W	9H	10		130	1	-1
6 Hardie Team	15 Turner Team	3 E	2S	11		200	3	-3
7 Mulholland Team	16 Kemmer Team	2 E	4S	12		230	-2	2

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	2
2NT by EW	+1	-150	1
3 by EW	+2	-150	3
3 by EW	+2	-150	1
2 by EW	+3	-150	1
2 by EW	+4	-170	1
2 by EW	+5	-190	1
2 by EW	+5	-190	1
3 by EW	+2	-200	1
2 by EW	+4	-230	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
4 by EW	=	-620	1