Boards Results

TEAMS OF 3 - MATCH 6

Board No: 29
Dealer: N, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 100

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

14 Waters Team 11 Hardman Team 2 W JD 8 110 -1 1

6 Hardie Team 15 Turner Team 2 W 6S 8 90 -5 5

1 Burman Team 13 Cowcill Team 1 W JD 7 80 -7 7

8 Ford Team 2 Hunter Team 1 W JD 7 80 -7 7

11 Hardman Team 14 Waters Team 1 E 6C 7 80 1 -1

3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team 5 Davis Team 1NT E 3C 6 100 -5 5

7 Mulholland Team 16 Kemmer Team 2 W JD 7 100 0 0

9 Webb Team 12 Sampson Team 3 W 6S 8 100 -5 5

15 Turner Team 6 Hardie Team 1 E 3C 6 100 5 -5

16 Kemmer Team 7 Mulholland Team 2 W 6S 7 100 0 0

2 Hunter Team 8 Ford Team 3 W 2H 7 200 7 -7

10 Blakely Team 4 Hardman Team 2NT W 2C 6 200 -3 3

13 Cowcill Team 1 Burman Team 1NT E 3C 5 200 7 -7

4 Hardman Team 10 Blakely Team 1NT E 7H 4 300 3 -3

5 Davis Team 3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team 2NT E QC 5 300 5 -5

12 Sampson Team 9 Webb Team 2 E QC 5 300 5 -5

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

BOARD 29

BD: 29 J642 Dlr: N

KQJ8 Vul: Both

852

92

A985 QT7

A72 T5

T4 A93

AT76 KQ843

K3

9643

KQJ76

J5

NT

N - - - - - 7

S - - - - - 12 11

E 4 - - 4 3 10

W 4 - - 4 3

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract Result Score Frequency
1NT by EW -3 300 1
2NT by EW -3 300 1
2 by EW -3 300 1
3 by EW -2 200 1
2NT by EW -2 200 1
1NT by EW -2 200 1
1NT by EW -1 100 1
2 by EW -1 100 1
3 by EW -1 100 1
1 by EW -1 100 1
2 by EW -1 100 1
1 by EW = -80 2
1 by EW = -80 1
2 by EW = -90 1
2 by EW = -110 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
14 Waters Team	11 Hardman Team	2 W	JD	8		110	-1	1
6 Hardie Team	15 Turner Team	2 W	6S	8		90	-5	5
1 Burman Team	13 Cowcill Team	1 W	JD	7		80	-7	7
8 Ford Team	2 Hunter Team	1 W	JD	7		80	-7	7
11 Hardman Team	14 Waters Team	1 E	6C	7		80	1	-1
3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	5 Davis Team	1NT E	3C	6	100		-5	5
7 Mulholland Team	16 Kemmer Team	2 W	JD	7	100		0	0
9 Webb Team	12 Sampson Team	3 W	6S	8	100		-5	5
15 Turner Team	6 Hardie Team	1 E	3C	6	100		5	-5
16 Kemmer Team	7 Mulholland Team	2 W	6S	7	100		0	0
2 Hunter Team	8 Ford Team	3 W	2H	7	200		7	-7
10 Blakely Team	4 Hardman Team	2NT W	2C	6	200		-3	3
13 Cowcill Team	1 Burman Team	1NT E	3C	5	200		7	-7
4 Hardman Team	10 Blakely Team	1NT E	7H	4	300		3	-3
5 Davis Team	3 JUNE MULHOLLAND Team	2NT E	QC	5	300		5	-5
12 Sampson Team	9 Webb Team	2 E	QC	5	300		5	-5

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
1NT by EW	-3	300	1
2NT by EW	-3	300	1
2 by EW	-3	300	1
3 by EW	-2	200	1
2NT by EW	-2	200	1
1NT by EW	-2	200	1
1NT by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	-1	100	1
1 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
1 by EW	=	-80	2
1 by EW	=	-80	1
2 by EW	=	-90	1
2 by EW	=	-110	1