Boards Results

TEAMS OF 3 WITH MENTORS - MATCH 5

Board No: 29
Dealer: N, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -210

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

18 O'connell 8 Brooks 3NT W QD 11 660 -13 13

4 Dundas 12 Walker 3NT W QD 12 690 -13 13

5 Dundas 10 Trend 3NT W QD 11 660 -13 13

16 Hardie 11 Hunter 5 E AH 11 600 -9 9

9 Rogoysky 6 Ford 3 E AH 10 130 -6 6

17 Sheffield 1 McConnell 3 E AH 9 110 -5 5

2 Sampson 13 Rogoysky 2NT W 4D 11 210 -2 2

7 Field 3 Maltby 3NT W QD 13 720 -2 2

14 Wichems 15 Hardman 5 E AH 10 100 0 0

15 Hardman 14 Wichems 5 E AH 10 100 0 0

13 Rogoysky 2 Sampson 3 E AH 10 130 2 -2

3 Maltby 7 Field 3NT W QD 11 660 2 -2

1 McConnell 17 Sheffield 5 E AH 10 100 5 -5

6 Ford 9 Rogoysky 4 N 9H 10 130 6 -6

11 Hunter 16 Hardie 1NT W 4D 11 210 9 -9

8 Brooks 18 O'connell 5 E TS 10 100 13 -13

10 Trend 5 Dundas 5 E AH 9 200 13 -13

12 Walker 4 Dundas 5 E AH 10 100 13 -13

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Deal file from database

BOARD 29

BD: 29 Q863 Dlr: N

T875 Vul: ALL

AQJ94

AKJ7 54

J42 93

KT3 7

K43 AQJT9765

T92

AKQ6

8652

82

NT

N 4 4 1 9
S 4 4 1 15 7
E 4 9
W 4

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract Result Score Frequency
5 by EW -2 200 1
4 by NS = 130 1
5 by EW -1 100 5
3 by EW = -110 1
3 by EW +1 -130 2
2NT by EW +3 -210 1
1NT by EW +4 -210 1
5 by EW = -600 1
3NT by EW +2 -660 3
3NT by EW +3 -690 1
3NT by EW +4 -720 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
18 O'connell	8 Brooks	3NT W	QD	11		660	-13	13
4 Dundas	12 Walker	3NT W	QD	12		690	-13	13
5 Dundas	10 Trend	3NT W	QD	11		660	-13	13
16 Hardie	11 Hunter	5 E	AH	11		600	-9	9
9 Rogoysky	6 Ford	3 E	AH	10		130	-6	6
17 Sheffield	1 McConnell	3 E	AH	9		110	-5	5
2 Sampson	13 Rogoysky	2NT W	4D	11		210	-2	2
7 Field	3 Maltby	3NT W	QD	13		720	-2	2
14 Wichems	15 Hardman	5 E	AH	10	100		0	0
15 Hardman	14 Wichems	5 E	AH	10	100		0	0
13 Rogoysky	2 Sampson	3 E	AH	10		130	2	-2
3 Maltby	7 Field	3NT W	QD	11		660	2	-2
1 McConnell	17 Sheffield	5 E	AH	10	100		5	-5
6 Ford	9 Rogoysky	4 N	9H	10	130		6	-6
11 Hunter	16 Hardie	1NT W	4D	11		210	9	-9
8 Brooks	18 O'connell	5 E	TS	10	100		13	-13
10 Trend	5 Dundas	5 E	AH	9	200		13	-13
12 Walker	4 Dundas	5 E	AH	10	100		13	-13

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by EW	-2	200	1
4 by NS	=	130	1
5 by EW	-1	100	5
3 by EW	=	-110	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	2
2NT by EW	+3	-210	1
1NT by EW	+4	-210	1
5 by EW	=	-600	1
3NT by EW	+2	-660	3
3NT by EW	+3	-690	1
3NT by EW	+4	-720	1